Posted by:  Guest 34795  on June 25th, 2008steve O is a train wreck,God Did you see him on the late night show drunk as a skunk ,smashing the table,and they had to end the show,then run kimmel ,The next day he sends an email explaining her does not remember a thing ,lolMan get him in rehab before he hurts himself.

Posted by:  Guest 72659  on December 6th, 2007Hi webmaster!

Posted by:  Guest 42534  on November 10th, 2007Omg I fell so bad for that toppless girl Those boys should go to jail!

Posted by:  Dr Evil  on January 13th, 2007There is a stunt gel that retards burning, I wonder if they used that? Also lighter fluid is not as hot as petrol and less hot at the base of the flame-however if the flame got under the subject then there would be burns. I assume that as "professionals" they know how to reduce the risk, but there is still the possibility of tragedy, more so when non-stunt trained individuals engage in this foolishness, for example the "sexy girls ass on fire" video with dutch students allow the flames to get under the girl.
I would not dismiss the participants or girls as idiots. This form of behaviour has origins in a form of sado-masochism cailled "fire play" though this looks pretty extreme, but there is no denying the enormous erotic charge both for the participants and (I am ashamed to say) the viewer. However even in these terms how far is the public to go in protecting women from risk? After all the restriction of women under the Taliban and islamic regimes under the guise of "protecting" women has led to them immolating themselves suicidally and if they survive they have terrible injuries.
The women in these videos are reckless free spirits looking for a buzz and (if the gamble pays off) at most minor burns. There are more dangerous forms of sado-masochism such as asphyxophillia and there are more dangerous sports and stunts that women take part in (rope free climes, freediving) and of course there are female soldiers in Iraq, some returning with mutilating injuries. The beauty of woman makes the gamble more intense and the potential loss of that beauty terrible, but they seem to be getting off on it and escaping the potenially horrendous consequences.
I really would like to know if any long term skin damage resulted to the two participants

Posted by:  Dr Evil  on January 13th, 2007There is a stunt gel that retards burning, I wonder if they used that? Also lighter fluid is not as hot as petrol and less hot at the base of the flame-however if the flame got under the subject then there would be burns. I assume that as "professionals" they know how to reduce the risk, but there is still the possibility of tragedy, more so when non-stunt trained individuals engage in this foolishness, for example the "sexy girls ass on fire" video with dutch students allow the flames to get under the girl.
I would not dismiss the participants or girls as idiots. This form of behaviour has origins in a form of sado-masochism cailled "fire play" though this looks pretty extreme, but there is no denying the enormous erotic charge both for the participants and (I am ashamed to say) the viewer. However even in these terms how far is the public to go in protecting women from risk? After all the restriction of women under the Taliban and islamic regimes under the guise of "protecting" women has led to them immolating themselves suicidally and if they survive they have terrible injuries.
The women in these videos are reckless free spirits looking for a buzz and (if the gamble pays off) at most minor burns. There are more dangerous forms of sado-masochism such as asphyxophillia and there are more dangerous sports and stunts that women take part in (rope free climes, freediving) and of course there are female soldiers in Iraq, some returning with mutilating injuries. The beauty of woman makes the gamble more intense and the potential loss of that beauty terrible, but they seem to be getting off on it and escaping the potenially horrendous consequences.
I really would like to know if any long term skin damage resulted to the two participants

Posted by:  omg  on December 13th, 2006shes like 10 y.o.

Posted by:  guesty  on October 10th, 2006too hot

Posted by:  Guest2724  on October 10th, 2006too hot

Posted by:  Guest  on May 7th, 2006cool, how her tits are burning, whats her name ?

Posted by:  Guest  on February 6th, 2006stupid boy...hope he will be the next to burn...