interesting. This is why I'm glad someone tried to hack into the Pentagon computers, maybe some of our questions will be answered.
#16
Posted by: Guest on February 6th, 2006
Take a look at a handled coffee pot, turn it around and you will see that you are able to describe the coffee pot in a few different ways, that you have different impressions of this specific coffee pot. The person who would sit in opposite of you will describe the same scene from a different perspective.
Its the same with interrogating subjects. Each subject describe an incident on his specific way in his words. Every one who was ever able to read an "after accidents-incident report" with the (sworn) declaration of several witnesses knows, how different the stories of the same accident can be. This has something to do with the ability of a person to notice, remember and describe a happening in the aftermath. Blindfold a person, put a strawberry under the nose and ask what the person smell … the ability to smell is one of the most underdeveloped organs of the human body. So it is with determining sounds. The influence of stress factors (like the 9/11 attacks, personal involvement, etc.) alter the ability even more in certain degrees. Making the witness, willingness or not more or less reliable.
Start playing with this subjects declarations, a whole other story can be produced on such "facts-eyewitness stories". The producers have asked some critical questions, based on such "facts-or witnesses declarations". How the producer reflect such "facts" is up the essence specially in this case, since the producers of the flash animation are willing able to use it to confuse and undermine the fact that a airplane flown by hijackers went into the Pentagon.
By watching the flash presentation critically, ask yourself, witch intentions the flash video has, for instant why a speech of Adolf Hitler is used in the intro, or why they use alternative material of air crashes all on open field areas and not of airplanes crashing into buildings (like ELAL Bijlmer accident at Schiphol 1992), witch imagery can be excellently used to become familiar with the impact of a full load and full tanked airplane. A missile blast occurs several seconds and last for a short time. The fierce fire at the pentagon however, witch last for several hours, and the color of the flames, let us conclude that Hugh masses of fuel were burning.
The flash video is a shame for those who suffered death and or injuries in the 9/11 attacks.
#15
Posted by: Guest on February 6th, 2006
shame its the brits that have to pay for the money and power hunger of ther goverment! no wonder the arabs ar so F***ed off
#14
Posted by: Guest on February 6th, 2006
thanks to the dumb american sheep! that believe any thing ther told by bush, we will never know the facts
#13
Posted by: Guest on February 6th, 2006
wow none of you have any idea. not a freakin clue...
#12
Posted by: Guest on February 6th, 2006
this flash is total BS and a huge disrespect to the families of the pilots, passengers, and crew that were aboard that flight.
#11
Posted by: Guest on February 6th, 2006
you all are tards. If there was any truth to that i would have heard of some creditable info . Not from some gay euro trash that obviously hates the u.s.
#10
Posted by: Guest on February 6th, 2006
its all a set up..the trade centres , everything , watch a film called "loose change" oohh and the missing planes?? they were dumped at sea!!!
another botched plan for usa to rule the world
#9
Posted by: Guest on February 6th, 2006
blummin ek.... way too much to think about, however i will...