the proper US military jeep is exellent they copied the design from Landrover in england. they also stole the jet engine and pretty much everything else we have designed.. im not knocking the US of A as it introduced macdonalds and 50`cent and the concept of bling 2 worthy editions in the halls of fame.
im sure the proper hummer would mince those rocks however it would need a convoy of fuel trucks to keep it going over that 100yard stretch.
thing about americans is they dont think subtley, like there most prized tank batalions with state of the art armour millions of dollars spent and they power it with a jet engine.. no serious, so it cant face the wrong side of the enemy on the battle ground as a jet engine is white hot and is hotter than the flares they have to defend heat seeking missiles lol. any iraqi with a $100 US rocket launcher can destroy one. not so for the english cheiftan tank run a diesel engine as it works and doesnt need a convoy of 100 fuel trucks to follow one up.
#24
Posted by: Guest on May 19th, 2006
Hummers are big and rubbish like most american cars!!
#23
Posted by: Guest on February 6th, 2006
He should have spent $3000 on a 1975 Jeep CJ5. insted of $60000 on the H2
#22
Posted by: Guest on February 6th, 2006
so it's ugly and malfunctioning.... and GM wonders why they are losing so much money!
#21
Posted by: Guest on February 6th, 2006
A Civvy Hummer is definitely not as tough as a Military one!
#20
Posted by: Guest on February 6th, 2006
Oh, yeah ... did I mention, I'm a girl.
#19
Posted by: Guest on February 6th, 2006
Yeah, all you "foreigners" can say whatever you want, but I happen to drive a 12 year old Jeep Cherokee with over 100,000 miles on it, 3 tiny inches of lift and non-mud tires. This lowly Cherokee pulled out a stuck Hummer (H1) out of a mud pit last month (July '05). This was on the same trip where the Land Rover kept holding us all up because the doggone airbags couldn't get it up. Keep ya darn Land Rovers and Toyotas. I'll take a good ol' American made Jeep Cherokee ANY day.
#18
Posted by: Guest on February 6th, 2006
A good ol Ford will take ya anywhere you want to goe. The Hummer is a status symbol and nothing more. A chevy is, well a toy car with a metal engine.
#17
Posted by: Guest on February 6th, 2006
hey guess what frenchy, ive got a 10 year old chevy truck thats towed horses horses all across the states, towed my POS jap car that broke up the eastern seaboard and all the 4 wheeling you can take and guess what my only problem has been? come on guess. spun bearin? broken tie rod? i know, maybee teh clutch blew off its teeth, costing this "bloke" thousands of dollars. actually, my window comes off track occasionally (horrible isnt it) and thats it. i guess my truck is just put together poorly isnt it, with all my problems. eat my fruitbowl. everything mechanical breaks down. including your cars/trucks/suv's.
#16
Posted by: Guest on February 6th, 2006
why dont you just buy a f**king cheap, useful, eco freindly euro car. like a landrover, or get a good japp motor, like a super dooper s**t in your eye suzuki
The Last Emperor and his brother Aleksander do a Sambo demonstration in Korea. Pay attention, because this is the only time you'll ever see Fedor tap out.
im sure the proper hummer would mince those rocks however it would need a convoy of fuel trucks to keep it going over that 100yard stretch.
thing about americans is they dont think subtley, like there most prized tank batalions with state of the art armour millions of dollars spent and they power it with a jet engine.. no serious, so it cant face the wrong side of the enemy on the battle ground as a jet engine is white hot and is hotter than the flares they have to defend heat seeking missiles lol. any iraqi with a $100 US rocket launcher can destroy one. not so for the english cheiftan tank run a diesel engine as it works and doesnt need a convoy of 100 fuel trucks to follow one up.